https://www.avient.com/resource-center/knowledge-base/article/whats-difference-tpes-vs-silicones?ind%5B0%5D=6598
One caveat: Typical TPE shrinkage is around 2% while that of substrate materials is closer to 1%.
When looking to incorporate sustainable content into your TPE, the raw material cost may be more expensive than traditional materials for three reasons 1) supply chain maturity, 2) high demand, low supply, 3) location of source and supplier.
Check out this case study for a look at how TPEs were able to bring bottom line savings for an infusion pump.
https://www.avient.com/resource-center/knowledge-base/article/whats-difference-tpes-vs-silicones?ind%5B0%5D=6601
One caveat: Typical TPE shrinkage is around 2% while that of substrate materials is closer to 1%.
When looking to incorporate sustainable content into your TPE, the raw material cost may be more expensive than traditional materials for three reasons 1) supply chain maturity, 2) high demand, low supply, 3) location of source and supplier.
Check out this case study for a look at how TPEs were able to bring bottom line savings for an infusion pump.
https://www.avient.com/resource-center/knowledge-base/article/whats-difference-tpes-vs-silicones?ind%5B0%5D=6596
One caveat: Typical TPE shrinkage is around 2% while that of substrate materials is closer to 1%.
When looking to incorporate sustainable content into your TPE, the raw material cost may be more expensive than traditional materials for three reasons 1) supply chain maturity, 2) high demand, low supply, 3) location of source and supplier.
Check out this case study for a look at how TPEs were able to bring bottom line savings for an infusion pump.
https://www.avient.com/resource-center/knowledge-base/article/whats-difference-tpes-vs-silicones?rtype%5B0%5D=1164
One caveat: Typical TPE shrinkage is around 2% while that of substrate materials is closer to 1%.
When looking to incorporate sustainable content into your TPE, the raw material cost may be more expensive than traditional materials for three reasons 1) supply chain maturity, 2) high demand, low supply, 3) location of source and supplier.
Check out this case study for a look at how TPEs were able to bring bottom line savings for an infusion pump.
https://www.avient.com/resource-center/knowledge-base/article/whats-difference-tpes-vs-silicones?ind%5B0%5D=21537
One caveat: Typical TPE shrinkage is around 2% while that of substrate materials is closer to 1%.
When looking to incorporate sustainable content into your TPE, the raw material cost may be more expensive than traditional materials for three reasons 1) supply chain maturity, 2) high demand, low supply, 3) location of source and supplier.
Check out this case study for a look at how TPEs were able to bring bottom line savings for an infusion pump.
https://www.avient.com/resource-center/knowledge-base/article/whats-difference-tpes-vs-silicones
One caveat: Typical TPE shrinkage is around 2% while that of substrate materials is closer to 1%.
When looking to incorporate sustainable content into your TPE, the raw material cost may be more expensive than traditional materials for three reasons 1) supply chain maturity, 2) high demand, low supply, 3) location of source and supplier.
Check out this case study for a look at how TPEs were able to bring bottom line savings for an infusion pump.
https://www.avient.com/industries/healthcare/drug-delivery-systems
Office Supplies
Pet Care & Supplies
Auto-injectors and Drug Delivery Pens
https://www.avient.com/news/archives?page=52
Avient Announces Second Quarter 2025 Results...
Avient Announces Quarterly Dividend...
Avient To Hold Second Quarter 2025 Conference Call...
https://www.avient.com/industries/transportation/automotive/automotive-lighting
Low coefficient of thermal expansion
Office Supplies
Auto-injectors and Drug Delivery Pens
https://www.avient.com/resource-center/knowledge-base/case-study/tote-maker-differentiates-impact-modification?ind%5B0%5D=6596
Improved performance, reduced weight contribute to $500,000 in annual savings
The design team reached out to long-term supplier Avient GLS Thermoplastic Elastomers to help develop a customized solution.
In addition, the more efficient impact modifier saved the company nearly $40,000 a year in processing costs.